Daily Compliance Item- 2.23.17- 13.1.2.1.1- Off-Campus Contact with Signee

Ocean State University (OSU) men’s basketball team will be playing on the road this weekend. Shot Block, a prospect that signed an NLI with OSU in November, lives in the area and would like to meet with the OSU Director of Basketball Operations to make sure she is getting all the right information submitted to the NCAA Eligibility Center and the OSU Admissions office.

Since Shot signed an NLI with OSU, is it permissible for the Director of Basketball Operations to have off-campus contact with her?

No. NCAA Staff Interpretation- 2/10/16- Off-Campus Contact by Staff Other Than Permissible Recruiters with a Prospective Student-Athlete who has Committed to the Institution (I)- states that institutional staff members and coaches who are not permissible off-campus recruiters, may not have off-campus contact with a prospective-student-athlete, even if the prospective-student-athlete has committed to the institution by signing a National Letter of Intent or the institution’s written offer of admission and/or financial aid or the institution has received his or her financial deposit in response to its offer of admission.

[References: NCAA Division I Bylaws 11.7.1.1 (countable coach), 11.7.2 (Recruiting Coordination Functions), 13.02.4 (contact), 13.02.12.1 (exception-after commitment), 13.1.2.1 (general rule), 13.1.2.1.1 (off-campus recruiters), 13.1.2.3 (general restrictions-staff members and governing board), and 13.1.2.5 (off-campus contacts or evaluations); and official interpretation (7/28/14, Item No. 1)]

Jennifer M. Condaras
Deputy Commissioner, NCAA Relations & Administration
Colonial Athletic Association

The opinions expressed in the Daily Compliance Item are the author’s and the author’s alone, and are not endorsed by The COLONIAL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION or JumpForward. The Daily Compliance Item is not a substitute for a compliance office, case specific research, or the NCAA Bylaws. Do some homework, ask around, and get it right.

Daily Compliance Item- 2.22.17- 12.5.2.1- Student-Athletes Participating in Student Polls

The Ocean State University student newspaper likes to include informal polls in each edition as a way to get to know members of the student body. Some of the questions include favorite movie, candy, restaurant, type of food, etc.

Is it permissible for the student-athletes to participate in this student poll since they will be asked to list commercial establishments?

Yes with conditions. NCAA Staff Interpretation- 4/20/15- Student-Athlete Providing Opinions on a Commercial Product or Service (I)- states that a student-athlete may provide an opinion about a commercial product or service, as long as no individual associated in any manner with the commercial product or service is involved in directing the student-athlete to issue the opinion, and the student-athlete does not receive any benefits from any source in conjunction with his or her opinion. [References: NCAA Bylaw 12.5.2.1 (advertisements and promotions after becoming a student-athlete) and an official interpretation (10/06/94, Item No. 2, which has been archived)]

Jennifer M. Condaras
Deputy Commissioner, NCAA Relations & Administration
Colonial Athletic Association

The opinions expressed in the Daily Compliance Item are the author’s and the author’s alone, and are not endorsed by The COLONIAL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION or JumpForward. The Daily Compliance Item is not a substitute for a compliance office, case specific research, or the NCAA Bylaws. Do some homework, ask around, and get it right.

Daily Compliance Item- 2.21.17- 16.1.4.3-Gifts to Ineligible Student-Athletes

The Ocean State University field hockey team won the NCAA Championship this year. The NCAA will be providing each member of the team with a championship gift. There are two student-athletes on the team that did not attend the championship. One has been academically ineligible all year and the other is serving a year in residence for transferring.

Can the NCAA provide a gift to these two student-athletes?

No. NCAA Official Interpretation- 12/12/94- National or Conference Championship Awards to Ineligible Student-Athletes- states that it is not permissible for an institution or conference (or organization approved by either) to provide awards in recognition of conference or national championships to student-athletes who were not eligible to represent the institution in intercollegiate competition during the applicable sport season. [References: 16.1.4.3 (conference and national championships) and staff minute 12/07/88, item c]

Jennifer M. Condaras
Deputy Commissioner, NCAA Relations & Administration
Colonial Athletic Association

The opinions expressed in the Daily Compliance Item are the author’s and the author’s alone, and are not endorsed by The COLONIAL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION or JumpForward. The Daily Compliance Item is not a substitute for a compliance office, case specific research, or the NCAA Bylaws. Do some homework, ask around, and get it right.

Daily Compliance Item- 2.17.17- 13.1.6.2.1- Recruiting Restrictions and Signees

Three basketball recruits signed a National Letter of Intent (NLI) with Ocean State University (OSU) back in November. All three signees will be participating in a big AAU tournament next weekend, and the OSU coaches would like to go watch them play.

Per NCAA legislation, this is not an event that coaches are permitted to attend. Are they still prohibited from going if the sole purpose is just to watch their signees and say hello after the game?

Yes. NCAA Staff Interpretation- 2/17/17- Contact and Evaluation of Committed Prospective Student-Athletes (I)– states that a coaching staff member may not attend an event that involves prospective student-athletes if it occurs during a time period when it is not permissible to engage in recruiting activities (e.g., quiet or dead period, men’s basketball nonscholastic event during academic year recruiting period). This restriction applies even if the purpose of attending the event is to contact or evaluate a prospective student-athlete who has signed a National Letter of Intent or the institution’s written offer of admission and/or financial aid or for whom the institution has received a financial deposit in response to its offer of admission.

[References: NCAA Division I Bylaws 13.02.4 (contact), 13.02.5.4 (quiet period), 13.02.5.5 (dead period), 13.02.5.5.2 (exception — after commitment), 13.02.7 (evaluation), 13.02.13.1 (exception — after commitment), 13.1.6.2 (practice or competition site), 13.1.6.2.1 (additional restrictions — basketball), 13.1.7.5.1 (academic year recruiting periods), and 13.1.7.6.1 (academic year evaluation period)]

Jennifer M. Condaras
Deputy Commissioner, NCAA Relations & Administration
Colonial Athletic Association

The opinions expressed in the Daily Compliance Item are the author’s and the author’s alone, and are not endorsed by The COLONIAL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION or JumpForward. The Daily Compliance Item is not a substitute for a compliance office, case specific research, or the NCAA Bylaws. Do some homework, ask around, and get it right.

Daily Compliance Item- 2.16.17- 16.1.4- Memento to Student-Athlete for High Achievement

Flip Turn is a senior swimming student-athlete at Ocean State University (OSU). This weekend Flip has the opportunity to be the first female in OSU history to break 5 school records in one year. When she reaches this milestone, the coaches would like to give Flip a small keepsake item for her accomplishment.

Is this permissible?

Yes. NCAA Staff Interpretation- 9/13/13- Recognition of Accomplishments in a Particular Contest or Event (I)– states that an institution may provide a memento of nominal value (e.g., game ball, t-shirt, hat, etc.), which may not include cash or cash equivalents, to a student-athlete in recognition of an accomplishment in a particular contest or event as a benefit incidental to participation.

[References: 16.1.4 (types of awards, awarding agencies, maximum value and numbers of awards) and a staff interpretation (11/27/96, item a), which has been archived]

Jennifer M. Condaras
Deputy Commissioner, NCAA Relations & Administration
Colonial Athletic Association

The opinions expressed in the Daily Compliance Item are the author’s and the author’s alone, and are not endorsed by The COLONIAL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION or JumpForward. The Daily Compliance Item is not a substitute for a compliance office, case specific research, or the NCAA Bylaws. Do some homework, ask around, and get it right.

Daily Compliance Item- 2.14.17- 12.6.2.2- Donations Based on a Team’s Ranking

Ocean State University’s (OSU) development staff has engaged in conversations with an engineering company that recently moved its headquarters in the locale of OSU’s campus. The top executives of this company are big college sports fans and would like to commit to donating a designated dollar amount every time one of OSU’s teams earns a top 10 national ranking.

Is it permissible for OSU to accept funds from this company based on this parameter?

Yes. NCAA Bylaw 12.6.2.2 states that a member institution may accept funds donated to its athletics program from a nonprofessional sports organization based on an individual’s or a team’s national or regional ranking. (Revised: 1/9/06 effective 8/1/06)

Jennifer M. Condaras
Deputy Commissioner, NCAA Relations & Administration
Colonial Athletic Association

The opinions expressed in the Daily Compliance Item are the author’s and the author’s alone, and are not endorsed by The COLONIAL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION or JumpForward. The Daily Compliance Item is not a substitute for a compliance office, case specific research, or the NCAA Bylaws. Do some homework, ask around, and get it right.

Daily Compliance Item- 2.13.17- 17.29- Foreign Tour Eligibility

Ocean State University (OSU) men’s basketball team will be participating in a foreign tour this summer. High Post, a student-athlete that will exhaust his eligibility at the conclusion of the academic year, would like to participate in the tour.

Is it permissible for High to participate in OSU’s foreign tour since he will have exhausted his eligibility prior to the start of the tour?

Yes with conditions. NCAA Educational Column- 2/15/16- Foreign Tours (I)- provides further clarification on many commonly asked questions surrounding foreign tours.

The following questions and answers are intended to assist the membership in applying NCAA Division I legislation as it relates to foreign tours.

Eligibility and Participation

Question No. 1: May a student-athlete participate in a foreign tour during the summer immediately after exhausting eligibility?

Answer No. 1: Yes, provided the student-athlete was eligible for intercollegiate competition during the previous academic year and has not professionalized himself/herself.

Question No. 2: May a continuing student-athlete who was not enrolled at the institution during the previous academic year participate on the institution’s foreign tour during the following summer?

Answer No. 2: Yes, provided the student-athlete was eligible for intercollegiate athletics in his or her most recent academic year of enrollment at the certifying institution.
For example, a student-athlete who was on an official religious mission during the 2015-16 academic year may participate on the institution’s foreign tour during summer 2016, provided he or she was eligible during his or her most recent academic year of enrollment at the institution.

Question No. 3: May a student-athlete participate in a foreign tour that occurs during the summer immediately following an academic year in which the student-athlete was ineligible during one term?

Answer No. 3: Yes. A student-athlete who is eligible for any term during the previous academic year at the certifying institution is eligible to compete in the institution’s foreign tour taken during the summer immediately following the same academic year.
For example, if a student-athlete is eligible during the fall 2015 term at the certifying institution, but not eligible during the spring 2016 term, the student-athlete would be eligible to compete in the institution’s foreign tour that occurs summer 2016.

Question No. 4: May a midyear transfer who is ineligible for competition at the certifying institution participate in the institution’s foreign tour that occurs during the summer of the student-athlete’s year in residence?

Answer No. 4: No. A midyear enrollee serving a year of residence is not eligible for the institution’s foreign tour that occurs in the summer inasmuch as the student-athlete was neither eligible at the certifying institution during the previous academic year nor eligible for competition for the fall term following the foreign tour. This analysis would apply even if the student-athlete was ineligible due to a conference rule.

Question No. 5: May a student-athlete depart for an institution’s foreign tour prior to all of the student-athlete’s final grades posting for the summer term preceding the foreign tour?

Answer No. 5: Yes. It is not necessary that all of the student-athletes’ grades be posted, provided the institution can certify that the student-athlete will be academically eligible for the fall term immediately following the summer foreign tour (e.g., meets all progress-toward-degree-requirements) based on the grades that are posted.

Question No. 6: May a student-athlete who is eligible during the fall term but not eligible during the spring term of the same academic year represent the institution in a foreign tour during the spring term?

Answer No. 6: No. Since the student-athlete is not eligible to represent the institution in any intercollegiate competition during the spring term, he or she is not eligible for a foreign tour that occurs during that term.

Question No. 7: How does the “prohibition prior to the championship segment” legislation apply to sports in which separate dates are specified for the first permissible date of practice and the first permissible date of competition for the championship segment?

Answer No. 7: An institution may not depart for a foreign tour during the following period: 30 days prior to the first date of practice or until the first date of competition or contest in the championship segment. This prohibition includes travel days. The intent of this legislation is to prohibit teams from gaining additional preseason practice time by scheduling a foreign tour prior to the championship segment.

Question No. 8: How does the “prohibition prior to the championship segment” legislation apply to sports in which the same date is specified for the first permissible date of practice and first permissible date of competition?

Answer No. 8: An institution may not engage in a foreign tour for a period of 30 days prior to the first day of the institution’s declared playing and practice season.

Question No. 9: If an institution participates in an event that meets the legislation to be a qualifying regular season multiple-team event, would the team’s participation in the event also count as its once-every-four years in-season foreign competition?

Answer No. 9: No. Further, participation in either a permissible qualifying regular season multiple team event or an in-season foreign competition does not preclude an institution from participating in an institutionally certified foreign tour once in four years, provided all other elements of the foreign tour legislation are met.

Question No. 10: In basketball, is a graduate transfer student-athlete required to satisfy the first prong of the basketball exception for foreign tour eligibility of incoming student-athletes by earning three hours of acceptable degree credit during the summer term prior to participating in a foreign tour and practice for the tour?

Answer No. 10: No. The graduate transfer student-athlete must only have graduated from the previous institution, have evidenced his or her commitment to applicant institution, have been accepted for enrollment in a graduate program at applicant institution, and have satisfied the second prong of the exception requiring the student-athlete to be eligible to represent the institution in intercollegiate athletics during the academic year following the tour.
The graduate transfer student-athlete may evidence his or her commitment to applicant institution by signing an institution’s written offer of admission and/or financial aid or by submitting a financial aid deposit in response to the institution’s offer of admission.

Question No. 11: May a transfer student-athlete in basketball participate in more than one institutional foreign tour?

Answer No. 11: A student-athlete may not participate in more than one foreign tour for a specific institution; however, the student-athlete is not precluded from participating in a foreign tour for a second institution as long as he or she meets all of the other applicable eligibility requirements for the tour.

Practices

Question No. 12: May a student-athlete, who is serving a year of residence or is otherwise ineligible to compete in the foreign tour, participate in practices associated with the foreign tour?

Answer No. 12: No, such a student-athlete is not eligible for practice associated with the foreign tour because he or she is not eligible to participate in the tour.

Question No. 13: May an ineligible student-athlete observe practice for the institution’s foreign tour?

Answer No. 13: Yes, provided the practices are open to the general public and the student-athlete does not participate in any team activities.

Question No. 14: Are student-athletes participating in permissible practice activities prior to a foreign tour subject to countable athletically related activities limitations (i.e., four hours/day, 20 hours/ week, required day off)?

Answer No. 14: No. There are no daily or weekly hour limitations when student-athletes are participating during the 10 days of practice in preparation for competition in the foreign tour, provided the day occurs during an institutional vacation period.

Question No. 15: May an institution publicize practices associated with a foreign tour?

Answer No. 15: Yes.

Outside-Team Tours

Question No. 16: May a student-athlete serving a year of residence participate on an outside-team foreign tour if he or she is ineligible to compete on an institution’s foreign tour?

Answer No. 16: Yes. A student-athlete serving a year of residence at an institution may participate in an outside team tour regardless of whether he or she meets the eligibility requirements to participate in an institution’s foreign tour, provided the number of student-athletes participating on the outside team from the same member institution does not exceed the limitations set forth in the outside-team tours legislation. If the number of student-athletes participating on the outside team tour is more than the limitations in the outside-team tours legislation, the outside-team tour must be certified by the institution and the student-athletes must meet eligibility requirements as noted in the legislation.

Question No. 17: May an institution’s coach be a coach of an outside team participating in a foreign tour that includes student-athletes from the institution’s roster?

Answer No. 17: Yes.

Question No. 18: May an institution’s noncoaching staff member with sport-specific responsibilities participate in an outside foreign tour as a noncoaching staff member for a team that includes current student-athletes from the institution?

Answer No. 18: Yes; however, the noncoaching staff member with sport-specific responsibilities may not participate in coaching activities and may not participate with or observing student-athletes in the staff member’s sport who are engaged in nonorganized voluntary athletically related activities.

Expenses

Question No. 19: May an outside sponsor provide expenses to a student-athlete participating in an outside foreign tour?

Answer No. 19: Yes. An outside sponsor may provide actual and necessary expenses for a student-athlete to participate in outside competition, as long as the outside sponsor is not an agent, representative of the institution’s athletics interests, or a professional sports organization.

Question No. 20: May an institution or booster be involved in fundraising for a student-athlete participating in an outside tour?

Answer No. 20: No. Neither an institution nor a booster may have any involvement in fundraising for a student-athlete or outside team foreign tour. In addition, neither may arrange for a student-athlete’s financial sponsorship from an outside source because it would trigger extra benefit legislation. However, it is permissible for a representative of the institution’s athletics interests to donate to an outside team, provided the representative acts independently of the institution, the funds are distributed through channels established by the organization conducting the fundraising activity and the funds are not earmarked directly for a specific student-athlete.

Question No. 21: For outside-team tours, may an outside sponsor provide a student-athlete expenses through fundraising activities that are made on behalf of or earmarked for the student-athlete?

Answer No. 21: Yes. An outside sponsor may provide a student-athlete, who is a member of a team or who participates in a sport as an individual, actual and necessary expenses for competition and practice held in preparation for that competition, provided the sponsor is not an agent or representative of an institution’s athletics interests.

Question No. 22: May an institution provide a student-athlete expenses to return home or to a destination other than campus at the conclusion of a foreign tour?

Answer No. 22: Yes. An institution may provide actual and necessary expenses to a student-athlete to represent the institution in practice and competition, including travel expenses incidental to practice or competition. This provides member institutions flexibility when determining which travel expenses may be reasonably considered incidental to practice or competition, including expenses for student-athletes who do not travel with the team to or from competition during vacations periods (e.g., travel from the competition site to home prior to returning to campus) and travel to the institution for purposes of engaging in required practice activities after the student-athlete’s initial arrival on campus for the academic year.

Question No. 23: May an institution provide entertainment to eligible student-athletes, who will be participating on the foreign tour while on campus for practices for the foreign tour and during the foreign tour?

Answer No. 23: Yes. For purposes of entertainment in conjunction with practice in preparation for the foreign tour competition, the foreign tour is considered “in season.” Therefore, it is permissible to provide entertainment to student-athletes prior to the foreign tour (while on-campus) and during the foreign tour.

Question No. 24: May a student-athlete be involved in institutional fundraising activities for the institution’s foreign tour?

Answer No. 24: Yes. An institution or recognized entity of the institution, conference, or noninstitutional charitable, educational or nonprofit agency may use a student-athlete’s name, picture of appearance to support its charitable or educational activities or to support activities considered incidental to the student-athlete’s participation in intercollegiate athletics, provided the conditions for permissible promotional activities for institutional, charitable, education or nonprofit promotions legislation are met.

Question No. 25: May an institution pay to acquire copies of a student-athlete’s birth certificate or visa, provided the birth certificates and visas are credentials required for travel in connection with a foreign tour?

Answer No. 25: Yes.

Question No. 26: May an institution purchase passports for incoming student-athletes who are required for travel with a foreign tour?

Answer No. 26: Yes; however, ideally the incoming or prospective-student athlete would pay for the passport, and once he or she triggers student-athlete status, the institution would reimburse the student-athlete. If the institution pays up front for the incoming student’s passport, it risks a violation if the incoming student never enrolls or is deemed ineligible for the foreign tour.

Question No. 27: May an institution purchase passports for continuing student-athletes who are required for travel with a foreign tour?

Answer No. 27: Yes. An institution may purchase passports for its student-athletes who are required for travel in connection with a foreign tour, and student-athletes may retain ownership of such passports. The institution also may provide student-athletes with reasonable local transportation to obtain such passports.

[References: Bylaws 11.7.1.1 (countable coach), 11.7.3 (noncoaching staff member with sport-specific responsibilities), 12.02.1 (agent), 12.1.2.1.4.3 (expenses from an outside sponsor), 12.3.1.2 (benefits from prospective agents), 15.01.6.1 (student assistance funds), 16.02.3 (extra benefit), 16.5.2 (permissible — housing and meals), 16.7 (entertainment in conjunction with practice or competition), 16.8.1 (permissible — expenses for practice and competition), 16.8.1.2 (other competition), 16.9.1 (permissible travel expenses not related to practice or competition), 16.11.1.8 (student assistance funds), 17.1.7.1 (daily and weekly hour limitations — playing season), 17.1.7.2.1.5.1 (basketball), 17.1.7.2.2 (skill instruction — sports other than baseball and football), 17.1.7.3.6 (vacation periods and between terms), 17.3.5.1.1 (qualifying regular-season multiple-team event), 17.3.5.1.2 (in-season foreign competition), 17.3.8.3 (involvement of coaching staff), 17.29 (foreign tours), 17.29.1.2.2 (prohibition prior to championship segment), 17.29.1.3 (time lapse between tours), 17.29.1.4.1.1 (exception — basketball), 17.29.1.4.1.1.1 (exception for practice prior to departure — basketball), 17.29.1.5 (practice limitation), 17.29.1.10 (passports), 17.29.2 (outside-team tours), 17.31.4 (exceptions — basketball), staff interpretation (12/12/2014, Item No. a), staff interpretation (8/22/2014, Item No. a), staff interpretation (5/15/2014, Item No. c), staff interpretation (2/28/2014, Item No. d), staff interpretation (9/27/2013, Item No. d), staff interpretation (1/28/2011, Item No. a), staff interpretation (8/11/1995, Item No. c)]

Jennifer M. Condaras
Deputy Commissioner, NCAA Relations & Administration
Colonial Athletic Association

The opinions expressed in the Daily Compliance Item are the author’s and the author’s alone, and are not endorsed by The COLONIAL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION or JumpForward. The Daily Compliance Item is not a substitute for a compliance office, case specific research, or the NCAA Bylaws. Do some homework, ask around, and get it right.

Daily Compliance Item- 2.10.17- Current Event

NCAA finding immunity useful in effort to crack difficult investigations

USATODAY.com

Despite the typical chorus of criticism for the NCAA’s enforcement arm — most recently over North Carolina’s long-running academic fraud case — it would be difficult to fault its level of activity. The NCAA enforcement staff has submitted 30 cases to the Committee on Infractions since Jan. 1, 2016 with seven currently in the processing phase and 59 more currently being investigated.

During that time, the NCAA has levied penalties against Notre Dame football, Missouri basketball, Southern Miss basketball and former basketball coach Donnie Tyndall while also issuing allegations against Louisville basketball and Mississippi football, which have not yet been adjudicated.

Among the most interesting trends in those recent cases has been the use of “immunity” as a means for the NCAA to collect information during investigations. While it’s long been written into the NCAA’s bylaws as a tool for enforcement, it has gotten significantly more attention recently due to its usefulness in cracking some high-profile cases.

The NCAA used the testimony of a former assistant, who was granted immunity and still works in college basketball, to issue Tyndall a 10-year ban from coaching. Investigators also spoke with former Louisville recruits at other schools to help corroborate allegations that a former staff member had arranged for strippers and sex acts on visits, and according to a Yahoo! Sports report, offered immunity to SEC players at other schools who had been recruited by Ole Miss in exchange for information on potential violations.

Similar to the U.S. legal system offering freedom from prosecution in exchange for helpful information, NCAA vice president of enforcement Jon Duncan said it’s a valuable tool but stopped short of citing it as the primary reason for a recent uptick in activity.

“We track a lot of things, but we don’t track historical use of immunity,” he told USA TODAY Sports in a wide-ranging interview last month on NCAA enforcement issues. “We use it as appropriate now; I don’t know if it’s more or less. But it is effective.”

Though the NCAA has no subpoena power to compel people outside of its jurisdiction to help investigations, coaches and athletes are bound by rule to speak with the enforcement staff and risk significant penalties for not telling the truth. Duncan said offering immunity is particularly helpful with athletes who might be fearful that they would incriminate themselves in violations.

“Our desire is never to focus on student-athlete culpability,” Duncan said. “In enforcement, our broader desire is to zero in and focus on the adult culpability, the grown-ups who are involved in violations, and one way to substantiate information or to get refuting information is to talk to the student-athletes or prospective student-athletes, particularly in our focus areas of recruiting and academic integrity.

“It is effective to help encourage that young man or young woman to cooperate with us if he or she knows they’ll be eligible to play and won’t be cited for a violation of the infractions process.”

Duncan cautioned, however, that the NCAA enforcement staff doesn’t “have a pad of paper with immunity on it we can pass out to kids” and can’t, by rule, use it as a fishing expedition to look for violations. In fact, any immunity offer must first be approved by the NCAA Committee on Infractions chairman based on a specific request by enforcement.

“We have to make a case to them for why each individual — occasionally it’s grown-ups — should get immunity, how it will affect the investigation and why it’s needed,” Duncan said. “Then we take that and share it with the young man or young woman and their lawyer. Is it effective? We believe we get credible information in exchange for immunity in most cases, but we always have to be discerning consumers of information. Whether it’s in exchange for immunity or not, we always test the information we get.”

While the NCAA’s handling of the North Carolina case has drawn ire from both sides — ACC commissioner John Swofford has suggested a large-scale overhaul of the Committee on Infractions system due to the length and inconsistency of the investigation, while others are unsatisfied with the lack of punishment yet for massive academic fraud — Duncan’s leadership since taking over the department in 2013 has helped clean up the mess left by the botched University of Miami investigation.

NCAA reinstates allegations against UNC football, men’s basketball
The NCAA enforcement division was accused of overstepping its authority in that investigation by going against the advice of internal counsel and paying the attorney of imprisoned booster Nevin Shapiro for depositions from his bankruptcy proceedings. An external investigation of the department’s conduct in that matter resulted in a significant personnel and operational overhaul led by Duncan, who said he has asked to be held to the same standard for his department’s conduct as the NCAA’s new coach control obligation, where a head coach can be penalized for violations committed by their assistants unless they demonstrated that they promoted an atmosphere of compliance and monitoring of their staff.

“I monitor my direct and indirect reports and I’ve tasked my leadership to do the same thing,” Duncan said. “Not to micromanage, but to know where our staff members are and what they’re doing. I think it’s a good way to run a railroad and it helps us understand, as best we can, the obligations a head coach has. It puts us in a better position when it comes time to decide whether to bring that allegation when we know what it feels like to have those obligations.

“We’re committed to make the right decisions for the right reasons without regard to the pressures that may be out there, and any departure from the bylaws or operating procedures is over my objection and contrary to my instruction. They all know that and then we follow up with monitoring.”

This article was selected for educational purposes only.

Jennifer M. Condaras
Deputy Commissioner, NCAA Relations & Administration
Colonial Athletic Association

The opinions expressed in the Daily Compliance Item are the author’s and the author’s alone, and are not endorsed by The COLONIAL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION or JumpForward. The Daily Compliance Item is not a substitute for a compliance office, case specific research, or the NCAA Bylaws. Do some homework, ask around, and get it right.

Daily Compliance Item- 2.9.17- 12.8.3.1.2- Hardship Waiver and Subsequent Nonchampionship Competition

Jump Serve is a volleyball student-athlete at Ocean State University. Jump fractured her ankle in early October 2016 and was unable to compete for the remainder of the championship season. Because of her injury, Jump received a hardship waiver from the Ocean Eleven Conference office.

Since Jump received a hardship waiver, is she permitted to compete during the 2017 nonchampionship segment?

Yes. NCAA Staff Interpretation- 3/31/04- Competition in the Nonchampionship Segment After Qualifying for a Hardship Waiver in the Championship Segment (I/II) – states that a student-athlete who uses a season of competition in a sport listed in Division I Bylaw 14.2.3.1.2 or Division II Bylaw 14.2.4.1.2 may be granted a hardship waiver even if he or she subsequently participates during the nonchampionship segment, with the understanding that the injury or illness that occurred during the championship segment resulted in the student-athlete’s incapacity to participate for the remainder of the championship segment.

[References: Division I Bylaws 14.2.3.1.2 (exception – women’s volleyball, men’s soccer, women’s soccer, field hockey, men’s water polo) and 14.2.4 (hardship waiver); Division II Bylaws (exception – women’s volleyball, field hockey, men’s and women’s soccer, men’s water polo) and 14.2.5 (hardship waiver); and a 1/14/88 official interpretation, Item No. 24, and a 7/10/02 staff confirmation, item 1b, which have been archived.]

NCAA Bylaw 12.8.3.1.2 states that in field hockey, men’s soccer, women’s soccer, women’s volleyball and men’s water polo, a student-athlete may engage in intercollegiate competition during the segment of the playing season that does not conclude with the NCAA championship without using a season of competition, provided the student-athlete was academically eligible during the segment that concludes with the NCAA championship. (Adopted: 11/1/01, Revised: 8/8/02, 10/31/02, 5/9/06, 7/31/14)

Jennifer M. Condaras
Deputy Commissioner, NCAA Relations & Administration
Colonial Athletic Association

The opinions expressed in the Daily Compliance Item are the author’s and the author’s alone, and are not endorsed by The COLONIAL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION or JumpForward. The Daily Compliance Item is not a substitute for a compliance office, case specific research, or the NCAA Bylaws. Do some homework, ask around, and get it right.

Daily Compliance Item- 2.7.17- 14.5.5.3- Competition During Year of Transfer JC

Can N. Ball is a diving student-athlete at Bay State University (BSU). BSU finished its fall segment on December 16, 2016 and started the spring segment on January 23rd. Can was not happy at BSU, so she transferred to Ocean State University (OSU) in January. BSU granted Can the one-time transfer release.
Since Can competed during the fall segment at BSU, can she compete for OSU in the spring 2017 semester?

 
Yes with conditions. NCAA Bylaw 14.5.5.3 states that a transfer student from a four-year institution, who has received a waiver of or exception to the transfer residence requirement (per Bylaw 14.5.5.2), is not eligible to compete at the certifying institution during the segment that concludes with the NCAA championship if the student-athlete has competed during that segment of the same academic year in that sport at the previous four-year institution. (Adopted: 1/10/95 effective 8/1/95; Revised: 1/14/97 effective 8/1/97, 4/29/04 effective 8/1/04)

 
NCAA Official Interpretation- 12/13/05- Eligibility of Transfer Student-Athlete for Competition in Year of Transfer (I)- states that if the institution from which a student-athlete transfers at midyear declares separate non-championship and championship segments of its playing and practice season, a student-athlete may compete during the non-championship segment for such an institution and during the championship segment for the certifying institution during the same academic year in the same sport, provided the applicable transfer and progress- toward-degree eligibility requirements are satisfied. [References: Division I Bylaw 14.5.5.3 (competition in year of transfer); a 5/25/95 official interpretation, Item No. 5, and a 2/25/04 staff interpretation, item a, which have been archived.]

Jennifer M. Condaras
Deputy Commissioner, NCAA Relations & Administration
Colonial Athletic Association

The opinions expressed in the Daily Compliance Item are the author’s and the author’s alone, and are not endorsed by The COLONIAL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION or JumpForward. The Daily Compliance Item is not a substitute for a compliance office, case specific research, or the NCAA Bylaws. Do some homework, ask around, and get it right.